{"id":17,"date":"2007-03-09T12:31:48","date_gmt":"2007-03-09T19:31:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/virtualsoul.org\/blog\/2007\/03\/09\/infocard\/"},"modified":"2013-05-02T18:04:59","modified_gmt":"2013-05-03T01:04:59","slug":"infocard","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/virtualsoul.org\/blog\/2007\/03\/09\/infocard\/","title":{"rendered":"infocard."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This is actually a precursor to the another post. While typing that post I became increasingly tired of typing &#8220;Identity Metasystem&#8221; and &#8220;Information Cards&#8221;, and have decided to revert to infocards. This is why&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m tired of trying to figure out what to call a system of software agents that support a particular style of interactions and data exchanges. Exchanges which are in the style of <a href=\"http:\/\/www-128.ibm.com\/developerworks\/library\/specification\/ws-trust\/\">WS-Trust<\/a>, use security tokens and security token services, employ an <a href=\"http:\/\/wiki.eclipse.org\/index.php\/I-Card\">information card metaphor<\/a>, and are probably to some degree compatible with <a href=\"http:\/\/cardspace.netfx3.com\/\">Microsoft&#8217;s Cardspace<\/a> implementation of an identity selector. What is that system called?<\/p>\n<p>I have read that some feel this system should be called the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/?page_id=355\">Identity Metasystem<\/a> and on my last rereading of Kim&#8217;s paper, I mostly think that&#8217;s his intent. Mostly. But I&#8217;m not sure. And certainly others tell me that the metasystem can&#8217;t be meta if it relies on specific protocol exchanges. Protocol exchanges <span style=\"font-weight: bold\">define<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: bold\">an identity system<\/span>, not a metasystem. Also, how can a protocol encompass future systems? It would have to be incredibly fuzzy and abstract (perhaps as fuzzy as WS-*).<\/p>\n<p>So a metasystem should encompass other systems &#8212; but does that mean other distibuted systems or other host based systems? Put another way, is a metasystem a conceptual thing only, since actual communications between agents would involve a specific set or system of protocol exchanges. Or is it a metasystem if it is a protocol system that is so incredibly felxible, extensible, and general that connectors can be written to connect all host based identity systems into it?<\/p>\n<p>Reading the paper again just now, I think that Kim&#8217;s intent is that the &#8220;Identity Metasystem&#8221; is a set of protocols and profiles &#8212; based on WS-Trust and sometimes called WS-*. But I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s commonly understood that way, and I&#8217;m not at all sure I&#8217;m right.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s also the concept of the <a href=\"http:\/\/podcast.burtongroup.com\/ip\/2006\/06\/identity_and_co.html\">MetaIdentity System.<br \/>\n<\/a><br \/>\nAnd I&#8217;m still tired of dancing around what to call it. So, in the posts that follow (until I&#8217;m corrected or change my mind) I intend to call it by name of infocard. Using the Microsoft code name as a generic term for the overall paradigm. I know most people now call them &#8220;Information Cards&#8221;. But that&#8217;s so LONG and I&#8217;m an old coder that doesn&#8217;t type well. It&#8217;s as long as &#8220;Identity Metasystem&#8221;. I like short, but specific names. Preferably all lower case. So I intend to refer to the specific visual metaphor as infocard, and the system as infocards, or perhaps, &#8220;an infocard system&#8221; when necessary.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is actually a precursor to the another post. While typing that post I became increasingly tired of typing &#8220;Identity Metasystem&#8221; and &#8220;Information Cards&#8221;, and have decided to revert to infocards. This is why&#8230; I&#8217;m tired of trying to figure out what to call a system of software agents that support a particular style of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-identity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/virtualsoul.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/virtualsoul.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/virtualsoul.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/virtualsoul.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/virtualsoul.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/virtualsoul.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":290,"href":"https:\/\/virtualsoul.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17\/revisions\/290"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/virtualsoul.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/virtualsoul.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/virtualsoul.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}